<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: United Front at Ealing Save the NHS demo</title>
	<atom:link href="http://rupahuq.wordpress.com/2012/09/15/united-front-at-ealing-save-the-nhs-demo/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://rupahuq.wordpress.com/2012/09/15/united-front-at-ealing-save-the-nhs-demo/</link>
	<description>A sociologist, Labourite and accidental blogger writes...</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 07 May 2013 11:31:19 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: residential tinting in aurora</title>
		<link>http://rupahuq.wordpress.com/2012/09/15/united-front-at-ealing-save-the-nhs-demo/#comment-6277</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[residential tinting in aurora]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Apr 2013 03:44:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rupahuq.wordpress.com/?p=3204#comment-6277</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Thank you for another wonderful article. The place else could anyone get that kind of 
information in such an ideal approach of writing?

I&#039;ve a presentation subsequent week, and I am on the look for such info.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thank you for another wonderful article. The place else could anyone get that kind of<br />
information in such an ideal approach of writing?</p>
<p>I&#8217;ve a presentation subsequent week, and I am on the look for such info.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: D-Day for West London A and E s Tomorrow &#171; Rupa Huq&#039;s Blog</title>
		<link>http://rupahuq.wordpress.com/2012/09/15/united-front-at-ealing-save-the-nhs-demo/#comment-6200</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[D-Day for West London A and E s Tomorrow &#171; Rupa Huq&#039;s Blog]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 18 Feb 2013 18:35:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rupahuq.wordpress.com/?p=3204#comment-6200</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] might remember the post here of September 2012 describing how thousands of local residents marched and took part in a rally on Ealin... Well since then October&#8217;s public debate at EalingTown Hall drew in 350+ people hostile to [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] might remember the post here of September 2012 describing how thousands of local residents marched and took part in a rally on Ealin&#8230; Well since then October&#8217;s public debate at EalingTown Hall drew in 350+ people hostile to [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Éoin Clarke (@DrEoinClarke)</title>
		<link>http://rupahuq.wordpress.com/2012/09/15/united-front-at-ealing-save-the-nhs-demo/#comment-5877</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Éoin Clarke (@DrEoinClarke)]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 15 Sep 2012 23:25:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rupahuq.wordpress.com/?p=3204#comment-5877</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Each A &amp; E should serve on average 270,000 patients. If the closures at Ealing (and elsewhere) go ahead, the ratio will be 1 A &amp; E for 375,000 patients.... That places more than 33% of an extra burden on A &amp; E services. In addition, 50 ambulance stations are being sold off &amp; shut down in London this year. Combined, this will kill sick and ill people in Ealing. It really is as simple as that.

As for finances, private companies are in cahoot with thousands of Consultants in a bid to distort the patient referral process. More than 50% of patients are offered no choice over their choice of where to receive surgery. This costs billions &amp; much more than could ever be saved from shutting Ealing&#039;s A &amp;E.

It requires no intelligent, just common sense to realise that the shutting of A&amp; Es in London is a gross injustice that will kill innocent and unsuspecting taxpayers.

Warmest regards,

Éoin Clarke.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Each A &amp; E should serve on average 270,000 patients. If the closures at Ealing (and elsewhere) go ahead, the ratio will be 1 A &amp; E for 375,000 patients&#8230;. That places more than 33% of an extra burden on A &amp; E services. In addition, 50 ambulance stations are being sold off &amp; shut down in London this year. Combined, this will kill sick and ill people in Ealing. It really is as simple as that.</p>
<p>As for finances, private companies are in cahoot with thousands of Consultants in a bid to distort the patient referral process. More than 50% of patients are offered no choice over their choice of where to receive surgery. This costs billions &amp; much more than could ever be saved from shutting Ealing&#8217;s A &amp;E.</p>
<p>It requires no intelligent, just common sense to realise that the shutting of A&amp; Es in London is a gross injustice that will kill innocent and unsuspecting taxpayers.</p>
<p>Warmest regards,</p>
<p>Éoin Clarke.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: EalingMarcher</title>
		<link>http://rupahuq.wordpress.com/2012/09/15/united-front-at-ealing-save-the-nhs-demo/#comment-5876</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[EalingMarcher]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 15 Sep 2012 22:48:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rupahuq.wordpress.com/?p=3204#comment-5876</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[What a load of sanctimonious twaddle. The Tories knew the elecorate wouldn&#039;t vote for what they want to do the NHS. So what did they do? They lied their smug faces off and once they got power implemented ruthlessly their vision of a health service chopped up and sold off. With the conditions for patients and people working in the NHS worsening by the day. Phil Taylor has got an almighty cheek. The fact is the Tories want an NHS run for the benefit not of patients but the private companies that hire their parliamentarians.

This is the worst right wing government in living memory. It makes Thatcher look like she wasn&#039;t really trying. You&#039;ve borked the economy, U turned on a 3rd runway and want the NHS run like the railways with profits pilfered from patients to line the pockets of Tory grandees Oh and Cameron lied about NHS spending http://blogs.channel4.com/factcheck/factcheck-nhs-spending-unspun/10905]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What a load of sanctimonious twaddle. The Tories knew the elecorate wouldn&#8217;t vote for what they want to do the NHS. So what did they do? They lied their smug faces off and once they got power implemented ruthlessly their vision of a health service chopped up and sold off. With the conditions for patients and people working in the NHS worsening by the day. Phil Taylor has got an almighty cheek. The fact is the Tories want an NHS run for the benefit not of patients but the private companies that hire their parliamentarians.</p>
<p>This is the worst right wing government in living memory. It makes Thatcher look like she wasn&#8217;t really trying. You&#8217;ve borked the economy, U turned on a 3rd runway and want the NHS run like the railways with profits pilfered from patients to line the pockets of Tory grandees Oh and Cameron lied about NHS spending <a href="http://blogs.channel4.com/factcheck/factcheck-nhs-spending-unspun/10905" rel="nofollow">http://blogs.channel4.com/factcheck/factcheck-nhs-spending-unspun/10905</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: rupahuq</title>
		<link>http://rupahuq.wordpress.com/2012/09/15/united-front-at-ealing-save-the-nhs-demo/#comment-5875</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[rupahuq]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 15 Sep 2012 22:28:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rupahuq.wordpress.com/?p=3204#comment-5875</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Hi Phil, Despite those much memed posters of the airbrushed Cameron insisting the NHS would be safe in Conservative hands these scandalous plans have already seen off one Tory health secretary. I think you need to address your concerns to Jeremy Hunt rather than me. Even the Daily Mail (hardly &quot;Socialist Worker&quot;) is urging its readers to do so: 

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2203809/A-E-shutdown-farce-backlash-begins.html?ito=feeds-newsxml]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Phil, Despite those much memed posters of the airbrushed Cameron insisting the NHS would be safe in Conservative hands these scandalous plans have already seen off one Tory health secretary. I think you need to address your concerns to Jeremy Hunt rather than me. Even the Daily Mail (hardly &#8220;Socialist Worker&#8221;) is urging its readers to do so: </p>
<p><a href="http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2203809/A-E-shutdown-farce-backlash-begins.html?ito=feeds-newsxml" rel="nofollow">http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2203809/A-E-shutdown-farce-backlash-begins.html?ito=feeds-newsxml</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Phil Taylor</title>
		<link>http://rupahuq.wordpress.com/2012/09/15/united-front-at-ealing-save-the-nhs-demo/#comment-5874</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Phil Taylor]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 15 Sep 2012 21:39:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rupahuq.wordpress.com/?p=3204#comment-5874</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Rupa,

I do think you are being a bit cheeky here.  You know your current affairs and I am sure that you know that the £20 billion Nicholson Challenge was kicked off by Labour Health Secretary Andy Burnham in 2009, see here: 

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/politics/labour/6208651/NHS-told-to-find-ways-of-saving-20-billion.html

You also know that the idea of Nicholson is to reinvest the savings in new services so that the NHS can deal with increasing demand in a world where health spending is being protected but won’t be increased.  The proposals NWL NHS is putting forward drop directly out of their attempt to respond to that challenge.  That doesn’t make their proposals right though.  The solution that they have come up with is so inequitable, and its impact on Ealing is so disproportionate, that it is quite right that we should fight it.  To lose two A&amp;Es within our borders and two on our borders is just unreasonable.  All the pain of these proposals is to be borne by too small a group of people.  

You know full well that the Coalition has promised to maintain health spending in real terms and although people have quibbled about the odd million here and there, the government is maintaining health spending in real terms at a time when the overall economy is stagnant.  No-one in any other mainstream party is talking about putting the £20 billion back into the NHS so let’s all agree that a scheme like this would have come forward whichever mainstream party was in power and that the details of this particular scheme are wrong and particularly onerous for Ealing.  We need to fight this duff scheme not each other.  

We have all petitioned and marched.  The next thing people need to do is respond to the consultation.  Go here:

http://www.healthiernorthwestlondon.nhs.uk/have-your-say]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Rupa,</p>
<p>I do think you are being a bit cheeky here.  You know your current affairs and I am sure that you know that the £20 billion Nicholson Challenge was kicked off by Labour Health Secretary Andy Burnham in 2009, see here: </p>
<p><a href="http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/politics/labour/6208651/NHS-told-to-find-ways-of-saving-20-billion.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/politics/labour/6208651/NHS-told-to-find-ways-of-saving-20-billion.html</a></p>
<p>You also know that the idea of Nicholson is to reinvest the savings in new services so that the NHS can deal with increasing demand in a world where health spending is being protected but won’t be increased.  The proposals NWL NHS is putting forward drop directly out of their attempt to respond to that challenge.  That doesn’t make their proposals right though.  The solution that they have come up with is so inequitable, and its impact on Ealing is so disproportionate, that it is quite right that we should fight it.  To lose two A&amp;Es within our borders and two on our borders is just unreasonable.  All the pain of these proposals is to be borne by too small a group of people.  </p>
<p>You know full well that the Coalition has promised to maintain health spending in real terms and although people have quibbled about the odd million here and there, the government is maintaining health spending in real terms at a time when the overall economy is stagnant.  No-one in any other mainstream party is talking about putting the £20 billion back into the NHS so let’s all agree that a scheme like this would have come forward whichever mainstream party was in power and that the details of this particular scheme are wrong and particularly onerous for Ealing.  We need to fight this duff scheme not each other.  </p>
<p>We have all petitioned and marched.  The next thing people need to do is respond to the consultation.  Go here:</p>
<p><a href="http://www.healthiernorthwestlondon.nhs.uk/have-your-say" rel="nofollow">http://www.healthiernorthwestlondon.nhs.uk/have-your-say</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
