Another day, another mayoral debate

Stop me if you’ve heard this one before but yesterday night BBC London region was treated to the third televisual ding-dong between Boris Johnson, Ken Livingstone and PC Plod. The first was refereed by Konnie Huq, the third saw Jeremy Paxman grill the three and this latest one had Andrew Neil as question-master. Country cousins you didn’t miss much: it was the dullest of the three and if you are still not put-off by that you can watch it here.

Brian Paddick smiled a bit more than last time, maybe because someone told him how stony-faced he appeared for Paxo. The fact that there were no candidate opening statements unlike with the other two meant that he couldn’t fluff his lines again. I agree with LabourHome who said of last week’s performance that he has about as much in common with the average LibDem as Norman Tebbit (except maybe ex-Tory Nick Clegg – see below). Boris J looked as embarassingly shambolic and skew-whiff as ever attempting to play to the gallery with populist soundbites on crime and Ken was just Ken. Honest, straight, likeable, take-it-or-leave-it Ken. I doubt it changed a single audience vote as the baying crowd looked like they were all there to cheer on their faves and jeer their opponents.

Finally this cover from Friday’s Tribune is a corker. For people who weren’t around at the time, it’s revenge of the lefties from the Sun from polling day in 1992 that later led to the grammatically challenged headline “it’s the sun Wot Won It”. Sadly Tribune doesn’t have the same sized circulation to decide the whole outcome but let’s hope it jolts people into action. A Boris-led London would be a disaster.

Niggly point: they should’ve made it an enviro-friendly lightbulb.

9 Responses to “Another day, another mayoral debate”

  1. Thats the problem with hustings though. The room being packed with supporters from each side!

  2. Tom Paine's underpants Says:

    Surely that’s half the fun!

  3. By the way a mash-up of the Smiths awesome “Stop Me if You Think You’ve Heard This One Before” withthe grossly inferior comedy Mike Flowers pops-style Mark Ronson cover here

  4. Not being a Londoner I’m not au fait with the London Mayoral trail but I do wonder why there is so much fuss, publicity and money being spent on it (whose money I wonder!). As far as I know it doesn’t happen like this in any other city or town. I wonder whether its going to really make that much difference who does the job – whatever the job is! I take it you’re a Ken fan Rupa?

  5. Personally I thought it was the best of the three debates I’ve seen on TV, because Andrew Neil was better informed about the issues and able to cut through the baloney from all three.

    Not sure how you could have perceived Ken as being “straight” and “honest” though. He had clearly been misleading when he said on the Newsnight debate that putting up the CC to £8 was in his previous manifesto. Andrew Neil picked him on that and Ken was very shifty, claiming he hadn’t read exactly what was in his previous manifesto. Did he really *strike* you as being “straight” and “honest” at that point?

  6. If you think either of the earlier debates was a patch on Brillo’s show, then I can only conclude that you are suffering from a bad case of lukeakehurstitis and should see a consultant psychiatrist as soon as possible.

  7. Is that the conjestion charge or the pollution charge – or just a revenue generator?!

  8. The judgment on the debates is subjective. There is another tonight on ITV if the public aren’t yet sick of the sight of the threesome.

  9. Mark T'Mark Says:

    Ok.. if you liked the light bulb, perhaps these Kate Nash inspired mayoral songsters might be even more amusing…
    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=q2MLyV7wsAE
    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RdU9Ju9gRqI (does this one go a bit far – or does it make the point?)

Leave a Reply